THOMAS CARLYLE: - A most secretive yet very public intellectual who authored much about history yet begrudged having to do this. His biographers have yet to figure out what the secret he kept from them was; even though some of them were close friends. I think the secret has to do with the likes of Goethe. They developed a great deal of admiration for each other. But it might be that Goethe of the Illuminati actually was less connected to the true ruling body of our culture than Carlyle. His Swiftean influences seen in his book Sartor Restartus as well as the fact that his father was trained by a Mason, and they lived not far from the Templar Rosslyn Castle of the St. Clair or Sinclair family, leads me to believe he was a Hibernian like Nostradamus.

The Illuminati or Goethe is part of the same continuum as the Alumbrados which is really just a translation of the word Illuminati. St. Germain de Medici was the key figure in its founding and Masons still study his work even though few if any of them know who or what he was.

He married above his head when he became betrothed to a descendant of John Knox who founded Presbyterian Churches which might well have more than a Calvinist (Which has some connection to the Cathar/Huguenots and an order of Catholicism called Port Royal.) element of controlling people or managing society. He was a good person and did great work to educate the masses with his support of creating a Public Library. Those who suggest he was a forerunner of Nazism because of his desire to see a strong leader are missing the boat as I see it. There is nothing wrong with his concept of a beneficent leader who has near-to-total dictatorial power when it is compared with the lobbying cronyism of our so-called democratic systems. But he never saw a man who could be as good a leader (Peel for a while) as he would want to see in this role. I believe he genuinely wished for improvement and compassion between all life on earth.

I do not accept the theory that he beat his wife which is put forward by his wife?s family. In fact I wonder about the relatives who said that about Carlyle after the fact. We do know he said it was a secret which would render all biographies about him rather useless. Wife-beating would not render all biographies useless but being part of an Inner Sanctum that developed the government of the world for certain elites who keep the plans secret might be considered as such. Could he really have wanted de-population and the One World Order that Cecil Rhodes under the direction of Carlyle?s biographer John Ruskin developed? Yes, there is a connection between the psychology of wife-beating and the war-monger?s arts or other kinds of control freakishness.

One of his students by the name of John Ruskin inculcated the Illuminati principles in Cecil Rhodes whose influence and power is a blight upon humanity to this day ? so I could be wrong about him being as good as I think. In fact Rhodes and Hitler both had what some think is a daemonic event that made them (like Napoleon) into the men they became. I think the use of esoteric or occult possession techniques was involved by those who sought to control these men but I see little evidence that Carlyle was one who developed these techniques - so if he was part of it ? he was also a mere tool for them.

[CaRP] XML error: mismatched tag at line 102 - This appears to be an HTML webpage, not a feed.

Home - Index